Month: July 2018

⇐ Back to the beginning of the blog

Archives

tags: News, ВидеоRussian link | English link

Dmitry Borodin – conference CryptoShow

In the video – an interview with Dmitry after the conference CryptoShow, where he made a report and was in a group of experts (judges).

Dmitry Borodin (CryptoB2B), Sergey Sarkisian (Standartico.com) and Denis Kozminykh (CryptoShow/ShowICO founder) plan to jointly launch a new project. Now the technical basis is being prepared, how to implement and launch a decentralized voting procedure for projects at CryptoShow, so that experts (judges) directly could vote for projects directly in the detachment and thereby make a decision on real investment in projects. The block solution will supply CryptoB2B and will further be a technical partner who can be responsible for the ideal integrity, security and transparency of investment allocation methods.

tags: Article, ICO auditRussian link | English link

UBEX ICO: review, audit, security [rate: very bad]

img 5b4dc7caaa22d - UBEX ICO: review, audit, security [rate: very bad]

Despite the good business rating and rave reviews, from the technical point of view the project UBEX looks like a technical scam: the development plan is not disclosed, instead of the plan – water, release of tokens on the verge of foul, softcap – deception, technical level of the first product (smart contract) – extremely bad, fees of $7 million can not be checked.

UBEX is perhaps the most popular ICO in July 2018. It has collected a very large number of interested people, many revived reviews, videos, laudatory speeches, and positive forecasts have been ordered on the Internet. But…

The article considers a audit of the following objects of the ICO campaign at www.ubex.com, conducted by CryptoB2B on Jule 12, 2018, commissioned by a private investor:

  • methods of functioning of the Personal Cabinet about the sale of tokens
  • audit of a smart contract
  • technical component of the idea of the project (on the basis of reading White Paper).

Preliminary conclusion:

  • critically erroneous approach in the understanding of the blockchain authors
  • serious problems with smart contract
  • a complete lack of explanation in the WP, how and what the authors of the project are going to do
  • despite the steep business rating, our technical rating of the project UBEX: 0/10.

Read more:

read more

⇐ Back to the beginning of the blog